Posts
i just heard another one of the democratic scum, that say they represent america, calling anybody that didn't want this socailist healthcare bill passed a right wing terrorist.who the hell do these people think they are,what country were they elected to office,what makes a congressman or a senator think they can say this... first pelosi then reid and now whitstone,all three of them should be tried for treason,shot and buried in some other country.since when does a elected official get to stand up in congress and tell the american people they are not americans for disagreeing with them,they should be impeached and then arrested.
This morning, I read an interesting blog post by Paula Reed. Her entry was based on a quote she'd received by email:
“The Left: People who demonize those with whom they disagree.”
My first thought was to think of how so many neocons today are masters at the art of projection: they take what is commonly done by neocons and turn it around saying it's really liberals doing it.
Personally attacking one's opponents, instead of coming up with reasoned rebuttals to their ideas is intellectually dishonest and is a symptom of the creeping anti-intellectualism in this country; an example of the dumbing-down of America. It's much easier to blame liberals for everything that's wrong in our world today, than to come up with ideas on how to fix these problems together.
Gone are the days of erudite conservatives, such as William Buckley. Also largely gone are those conservatives, such as Barry Goldwater, who was able to often put ideological differences aside and work in a bi-partisan manner with his Democratic colleagues (now, I bet that is a word you don't hear too much in Washington nowadays) for the good of the country.
Now, it's neocon pundits, such as Limbaugh, Savage, and Coulter, among many others, who have brought the black and white, simplistic tactic of using ad hominems against their opponents in from the far right fringes of the tinfoil hat brigade into mainstream conservative thought. Or what passes for thought. This is not to say that the left is entirely free of such nonsense -- there are liberals, such as Rosie O'Donnell, who could hardly be called intellectual. But those such as O'Donnell hardly have the reach or the influence tha those in the pantheon on the right wing do
I heard a prime example of this type of anti-intellectualism the other night while listening to the radio. A man called the Dennis Miller show to express why he rejected intelligent design. Miller didn't give him much of a chance to speak. Instead he cut him off to say that he couldn't get on board with Darwinism because he just couldn't get into the idea of "worshipping a pile of amino acids" and that he liked the idea of an intelligent being creating life on Earth.
My jaw dropped when I heard this nonsense. I could not believe that Miller, a former liberal and former cast member of Saturday Night Live -- in other words, someone who should know better -- was spouting off such simplistic ideas. There was once a time when being a conservative did not mean one also had to accept intellectually bankrupt, fundamentalist Christian beliefs as well.
Instead of the Buckley types being the mainstream of conservatism, we now have the Archie Bunkers of the world running the Republican party, which is a sad thing for old-school Republicans and the party in general.
Thoughts?
Weight Loss
weight loss pills buy xenical online
Anti Bacterial
Anti Bacterial pills buy zagam,treat many kinds of bacterial infections of the blood, lungs, and skin - buy zyvox online
Muscle Relaxers
Muscle Relaxers pills buy zanaflex
Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal
Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal drugs buy zantac online , treat high blood pressure - buy ziac online , treat nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy - buy zofran online, heartbeat problems that may be life threatening - buy pacerone,an unusual or allergic reaction to valsartan, other medicines, foods, dyes, or preservatives diovan hct
Women's Health
Women's Health pills: buy zelnorm online
Anti Viral
Anti viral pills: buy zerit online, treat HIV - buy ziagen online
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure drugs: buy zestoretic online,treat patients with heart failure and patients who have had a heart attack Diovan 80 mg ,diovan valsartan,kidney disease diovan 320,diovan VALSARTAN is used to treat high blood pressure,heart failure - diovan 160 mg
Cholesterol,Allergy
Cholesterol pills: buy zetia online , reduce itchy skin rash and hives - buy zyrtec online
Diflucan
Reat certain kinds of fungal or yeast infections diflucan 150 mg,electrolyte abnormalities diflucan dosage,history of irregular heart beat diflucan pfizer,kidney disease diflucan side effects,an unusual or allergic reaction to fluconazole, other azole antifungals, medicines, foods, dyes, or preservatives diflucan canada,pregnant or trying to get pregnant diflucan kaufen,breast-feeding diflucan thailand.Do not use double or extra doses diflucan 100mg,birth control pills diflucan systemic yeast infection,diuretics like hydrochlorothiazide diflucan and thrush,medicines for diabetes that are taken by mouth diflucan over counter,some medicines for anxiety or sleep buy diflucan online,allergic reactions like skin rash or itching, hives, swelling of the lips, mouth, tongue, or throat diflucan treatment,feeling dizzy or faint does diflucan work,f you are taking this medicine for a long time you may need blood work side effects of diflucan,diflucan 200mg,diflucan without prescription.Alcohol can increase possible damage to your liver. Avoid alcoholic drinks diflucan dosage for yeast infection.If you have a vaginal infection diflucan infants help you,discount diflucan is an antifungal medicine, if you have answer how does diflucan work ,lso tell them if you smoke, drink alcohol, or use illegal drugs. Some items may interact with your medicine diflucan 50mg,Keep out of the reach of children diflucan while breastfeeding.
Dilantin
What side effects may I notice from this medicine? dilantin side effects,prevent seizures during or after surgery dilantin level and dilantin levels.Take this medicine by mouth with a glass of water dilantin toxicity.Talk to your pediatrician regarding the use of this medicine in children dilantin 400 mg,an alcohol abuse problem a dilantin 100mg ,treat heart problems dilantin lawsuits ,an unusual or allergic reaction to phenytoin, other medicines, foods, dyes, or preservatives dilantin weight
gain .If you think you have taken too much of this medicine contact a poison control center or emergency room at once dilantin anxiety, This medicine is only for you dilantin extravasation,dilantin for seizure.
diltiazem er 240mg
In recent news reports I read about a four year old pre-kindergarten Texas boy who has been suspended from school for having long hair. Say what? Is this 1959 or 2009? I thought that the right of male students to wear long hair had been settled years ago. Indeed, when I was in high school in the 70s, I wore long hair with nary a comment from the school, as did my son when he was in school in the late 80s into the 90s.
Taylor Pugh, who attends school in Mesquite, Texas, was given in-school suspension because school officials say that his hair, which long on the front and sides, covering his earlobes and shirt collar, violates the school district’s dress code policies. According to the district dress code, boys’ hair must be kept out of the eyes and cannot extend below the bottom of earlobes or over the collar of a dress shirt.
On the website of the Mesquite Independent School District, it makes reference to its dress code by saying:
“students who dress and groom themselves neatly, and in an acceptable and appropriate manner, are more likely to become constructive members of the society in which we live.”
Oh, really? The Mesquite school district apparently has no problem with female students who wear long hair and do not believe that long hair on girls is inherently messy or ungroomed, nor does it doom them to being future societal losers. But it would seem as if they believe that the same hair length on a male student automatically turn the same hair into a dirty mess, not to mention marking such boys as future bums or even criminals.
The school district’s rule about male hair length has nothing to do with hygiene or safety issues, as if it did, the same rules would apply to both boys and girls. Requiring neat and clean hair for all students is a reasonable rule — requiring short hair for one sex only is blatant sexism.
So far as hair length determining character and being a “constructive member of society” goes:
You’ll note the ribbon behind his head for his ponytail!
Though a bit thin on top, it’s long in the back!
I don’t think anyone would deny that George Washington or Ben Franklin were contributing members of society, long hair and all.
Likewise, short hair is not an inherent indicator of good character or potential to contribute positively to society:
I’m sure this style would be acceptable to Mesquite schools!
The point is, that male hair length is no reliable indicator of character or potential to contribute to society in a positive manner. Hair length is simply a matter of personal preference, thus is an invalid thing to regulate when forming dress codes.
I’m not saying that dress codes in and of themselves are invalid, but they must be based on common-sense criteria that is applied equally to everyone and ideally be based on matters of safety and actual hygiene, rather than on matters of fashion.
In 1996, Bill Clinton made the following comment about school uniforms:
“I challenge all our schools to teach character education, to teach good values and good citizenship. And if it means that teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniforms.”
While I don’t necessarily agree that clothing styles are necessarily linked to character, I do agree that rules pertaining to clothing are valid for employers especially and also for schools to a lesser degree. The reason I make the distinction between required/banned clothing and that of hair styles is that clothing is something that can be changed at the end of the day when the person is no longer at school/work. It’s not a permanent change, as people can wear what they prefer on their own time. And nowadays, rules about clothing are generally applied equally to both men and women, considering that women are now able to wear pants.
But hair length is a different matter. It’s a 24 hour a day thing. A male who prefers long hair can’t grow it back at the end of the day after school or work.
In conclusion, schools should have a single standard about students’ hair that applies to both boys and girls: that is be clean and neat, with no reference to length.
Thoughts?
I've not so far written about the Tiger Woods story because I viewed it as yet another story about a straying celebrity and that it would quickly become yesterday's news. Reports such as these are now rather commonplace and are hardly worth reporting on, let alone commenting on.
But this story outlived its fifteen minutes a long time ago and, personally, I'm getting tired of hearing about it. I don't see what all the shock and fascination is with this story. It's not as if he's the first, nor will he be the last celebrity (or non-celebrity, for that matter) to fall off the monogamy wagon.
I also don't see why Woods is off the golf tour. I don't see what one thing has to do with the other. The state of his marriage should be a private matter between him and his wife and it in no way impedes his ability to play golf. It's not as if being monogamous would make him a better golf player.
And it's not as if he beat his wife and had done something criminal. Indeed, if anything, the shoe is on the other foot in this instance. It seems the only reason he had an accident was because his wife bashed in the back window of his SUV, thus distracting him, as he tried to drive away.
I've read comments from people cheering her on for this; taking the opinion that he got what he deserved for his infidelity. The sexism of such statements boggles my mind, as I'm quite certain there would be no cheering if their roles were reversed in this drama. People would be calling to have him locked up and the key thrown away if it had been him bashing a window in with a golf club while she drove away. It seems when it comes to domestic violence and infidelity, the double standard is alive and well.
Other people are shocked, asking how could he do such a thing. Again, with the ubiquity of stories about celebrity infidelity and its corresponding prevalence in the lives of ordinary people as well, I think that people are asking the wrong questions. They take the view that people are failing marriage, but in reality, it would seem that our idea of what marriage should be is failing people.
Instead of asking why so many people are unfaithful, we need to be asking such questions as, why are all marriages expected to be monogamous, why was monogamy originally instituted in the first place, are the original reasons for monogamy still relevant in our society today, what is the exact nature of "fidelity" -- is it summed up by sexual exclusivity or can it refer to other aspects of a marriage and, if so, must sexual exclusivity always be a part of it. and so on.
Perhaps we need to be re-examining and re-evaluating the structure of marriage and the purpose it serves in our society and be willing to make some changes, instead of trying harder to cram people down into the same old, ill-fitting boxes.
Thoughts?
We are happy to provide our customers with a wide selection of drugs
for physical and emotional health. If you would like to compare our
site with any other buy
advair diskus on the net then the key differences will be:
- Wide range of branded and generic drugs as buy albenza as herbal and homeopathic medications
- Low prices for buy alesse the most prescribed and buy aldactone known drugs
- Making an order on Drugs-pro cannot be easier. And buy aleve after the order has been made our customer support service will bend every effort to provide you with fast and exact delivery and buy allegra
- Most of our drugs do not need a prescription and need to buy altace
- All the medications on our site are provided with a buy amaryl description
from which you can learn how the drug works in your body and what
side-effects and contradictions exist and buy Avalide
- Our qualified pharmacist are sure to buy amoxil all additional
questions that you will have regarding the products presented on our
site or buy anafranil
- All the information provided for buy antabuse the purchase is kept 100% confidential
Our goal is to buy arava satisfy our customers and buy arcoxia them with excellent
support service, as well as high quality drugs for buy aricept the needed
treatment. The medications which we buy arimidex selling are produced all other
the world by such respectful companies as Pfizer, Gedeon Richter, UCB,
Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis and others. We want to help you save not only
your health but also your money due to the fact that our prices are the
lowest on the web.
we maintain extremely rigorous standards in patient Buy Generic Zoloft. We buy adipex access to essential prescription drugs should be safe, convenient, and buy atrovent for all. Canada DrugsTM is a certified member of the Canadian Internet Pharmacy Association (buy augmentin), the Manitoba International Pharmacists Association (buy avandamet), the Better Business Bureau (buy avandia), VeriSign and is a 5 star rated pharmacy from Pharmacy buy avapro. As a premiere Canadian Internet-based and mail order pharmacy, buy avelox LP is licensed by the Manitoba Pharmaceutical Association to distribute prescription medication.
